President Trump has raised his damages demand against the BBC from $1 billion to $5 billion after discovering that an edited speech was used in a documentary to mislead viewers about what the President actually said on January 6. The BBC quickly put out a statement claiming it “regretted” how the editing looked but insisted it had done nothing wrong. That defense did not last long. The Telegraph pointed out that the BBC tried the same stunt back in 2022 when it edited footage of Trump’s speech on its Newsnight program to make it look as if he told his supporters to riot. The edit outlined in Panorama last year was, according to the report, nearly identical. If you are keeping score, that means the BBC manufactured video by mashing together separate remarks, presented it as proof of some nonexistent narrative, then showed it to millions of viewers.
James Zumwalt summed this up well, saying the BBC probably won’t win this fight. Anyone with experience in news can recognize that stitching clips together to create a false story is pretty much what “libelous and defamatory” means. If the BBC were a business subject to real scrutiny, it would be held responsible like any other company for pumping out propaganda under the guise of journalism. The BBC, as usual, declares there is no “pattern” of wrongdoing. That is a convenient talking point but not one supported by recent reporting.
According to the New York Post, newly-leaked emails reveal more evidence against the BBC. Starting as early as 2020, female staff repeatedly warned editors that the state-backed broadcaster was not just left-leaning but had gone completely off the rails with its coverage of trans issues. The emails show staff objected to stories that refer to biologically male sex offenders as “women,” and reported that management avoided using words like “girls” and “women” for topics like periods and birth control. This is what happens when an outlet hires activist gatekeepers to block certain facts from reaching the public.
The women also described a culture of fear at the BBC, where even veteran reporters didn’t dare to stray from the position on trans issues, lest they be branded ‘transphobic,’ the Times reported. ‘Any questioning or insufficiently enthusiastic championing risked being labeled as bigoted … It felt like activism, not news,’ one BBC staffer told the Sunday Times.
An internal memo makes it clear all trans-related stories were censored by so-called LGBTQ specialists whose job, it appears, was to keep anything critical from seeing the light of day. Staff described a newsroom run on fear, where even long-serving journalists stayed silent or risked being branded “transphobic.” According to a BBC staffer quoted in the Sunday Times: “Any questioning or insufficiently enthusiastic championing risked being labeled as bigoted … It felt like activism, not news.” That feeling seems to be accurate. The BBC was uninterested in stories critical of the LGBTQ movement, no matter how relevant. This included investigations into hormone blockers for children and incidents involving men, claiming to be women, attacking actual women in prison units.
They want our children consuming nothing but state-approved propaganda. The BBC is a notorious mouthpiece for the woke establishment, and The Guardian is so structurally dishonest it had to abandon X because Community Notes kept fact-checking its lies and exposing its bias. They…
— Saggezza Eterna (@FinalTelegraph) November 3, 2025
When you consider the BBC’s public funding and close ties to the British education system, the problems become more significant. Maybe President Trump’s lawsuit will finally force a reckoning. For now, it looks less like journalism and more like state-sponsored propaganda on repeat.
***
More on this topic here.
English (US) · 