James Cameron is doubling down on his billion-dollar Avatar experiment, but the numbers may finally be catching up to him. With Avatar: Fire and Ash wrapping up its theatrical run well short of the box office glory of its predecessors, Cameron’s challenge now isn’t just creative, it’s financial. Can Disney really justify two more sequels if the returns keep shrinking?
Speaking to Taiwan’s TVBS News, Cameron offered a blunt assessment of the situation and a few cautious promises for the future. “Michelle [Yeoh] is definitely going to be in 4, if we make 4,” he said. “The movie industry is depressed right now. Avatar 3 cost a lot of money. We have to do well to continue. We need to figure out how to make Avatar movies more inexpensively in order to continue.”
That’s a striking admission from one of Hollywood’s biggest risk-takers. Cameron confirmed that, if greenlit, Avatar 4 and Avatar 5 would film together, just as Avatar: The Way of Water and Avatar 3 were. “It’s one big story,” he said. “And Michelle will be in 4 and 5. She will play a performance capture character named Paktu’eylat. She will be a Na’vi.”
But while Cameron’s comments focused on costs, a bigger question still lingers: how does the filmmaker known for innovation square his public AI skepticism with his very visible ties to the tech? Speaking to ComicBook last year, Cameron said, “I’m not negative about generative AI. I just wanted to point out we don’t use it on the Avatar films. We honor and celebrate actors. We don’t replace actors.”
That sounds reassuring, but skeptics aren’t convinced. After all, this is the same director who, in 2024, quietly joined the board of StabilityAI, a company at the forefront of the generative AI revolution. At the time, he said he had spent his life “seeking out emerging technologies that push the boundaries of what’s possible” and that “the intersection of generative AI and CGI image creation is the next wave.” So what exactly does that mean for the future of Avatar?
Some fans fear it means we’ll soon see AI-generated actors, like the controversial virtual performer Tilly Norwood, making their way into Cameron’s vision of Pandora. Could Cameron, the man who gave the world Terminator movies and The Abyss, become the filmmaker who takes the next technology advance in Hollywood by replacing humans with code?
If that day comes, it won’t just change Avatar. It could mark the end of Hollywood as we know it. With more AI-created content flooding social media, the line between real and fake is already blurring. The next few years may be the last chance for moviegoers to decide whether they still want real performers—or if the machine-made illusion is enough.
***
English (US) · 